Fraud upon the court

Fraud upon the courtFraud upon the courtFraud upon the court
  • Home
  • Exposing Fraud
  • Fillings
    • OARC FIllings
    • Motion to Vacate
  • Blog
  • Insight & Media
    • Facts vs Deceoption
    • Press Releases
    • Alegations
    • The Accused
  • Bell's Statement
  • More
    • Home
    • Exposing Fraud
    • Fillings
      • OARC FIllings
      • Motion to Vacate
    • Blog
    • Insight & Media
      • Facts vs Deceoption
      • Press Releases
      • Alegations
      • The Accused
    • Bell's Statement

Fraud upon the court

Fraud upon the courtFraud upon the courtFraud upon the court
  • Home
  • Exposing Fraud
  • Fillings
    • OARC FIllings
    • Motion to Vacate
  • Blog
  • Insight & Media
    • Facts vs Deceoption
    • Press Releases
    • Alegations
    • The Accused
  • Bell's Statement

Notice to Counsel and Officers of the Court

Financial Consulting

otice to Counsel and Officers of the Court


To the attorneys and licensed professionals named or referenced on this site:


Your duties under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct and the Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct do not end when misconduct is discovered  they begin there.


Under Rule 3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal) and Rule 8.3 (Reporting Professional Misconduct), any attorney who becomes aware of false statements, fabricated evidence, or fraud upon the court has an affirmative duty to correct the record and to report the misconduct to appropriate authorities.


To remain silent, or to allow falsehoods to persist once verified, is to become complicit in the deception and to violate your oath as an officer of the court.


Under Rule 8.4(c), conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation constitutes professional misconduct — even if carried out indirectly through silence, delay, or procedural manipulation.


Each attorney and expert referenced here — including Ms. Carol Glassman, Mr. Jay E. Freedberg, Ms. Alyson Varvel, and Mr. Eric Six — has been repeatedly notified of these verified acts and invited to correct the record.

To date, none have disputed the evidence or offered any factual rebuttal.


The door remains open for each of you to respond.


Any statement submitted will be review and publised as long as it's claims are ground in fact and in law.


It is my belief  supported by C.R.C.P. 60(b) (final paragraph) and People v. Buckley, 848 P.2d 353 (Colo. 1993)  that when officers of the court knowingly allow fraud to continue uncorrected, they endanger not only the parties involved but the integrity of Colorado’s entire judicial process.

- Bell

Learn More

Copyright © 2025 The Glassberg Effect  | Partners & Bell

  • The Glassbergt Effect
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Blog
  • Press Releases
  • Alegations
  • Bell's Statement