Statement of Concerns

What began as one father’s fight for fairness in a Colorado courtroom has become the most thoroughly documented case of fraud upon the court in state history spanning multiple divisions, judges, and attorneys. It is a story about what happens when the people sworn to uphold justice manipulate it instead  and how one person, working alone, can still expose the truth. They may have the law, but I have the truth. 

The name The Glassberg Effect was born out of necessity.

It gave me a way to make sense of what I was seeing how patterns of deception, misdirection, and procedural exploitation can shape an entire case without anyone realizing it.

It’s not just a name for my experience; it’s a name for something I now know many others have lived through but couldn’t define.

The term describes how procedural confusion, selective disclosure, and attorney coordination can bend a court’s perception until the record no longer reflects reality.

It’s about weaponizing formality turning the rules meant to ensure fairness into tools that conceal misconduct.

This isn’t just about one case.

It’s about how the system reacts when someone without power a pro se litigant under ADA accommodations  uncovers verifiable misconduct and asks the court to look. Instead of review, the filings were labeled “harassing.” Instead of protection, the system defended itself.

To bring transparency to what has been hidden, to educate others facing similar tactics, and to restore the public’s trust that the law still belongs to the people it serves. Every document, transcript, and exhibit here has been filed with the Court. Every word is drawn from the official record. No speculation. No defamation. Just facts and the rule of law.