Why this site?

ABOUT THIS ARCHIVE: THE MANDATE FOR TRANSPARENCY

Why The Glassberg Effect Exists

This public archive, TheGlassbergEffect.com, was launched as a necessary measure for documentation, accountability, and personal safety. It serves to preserve the factual record of what occurred in Colorado’s 20th Judicial District so that it is available for review by affected parties, regulators, and members of the public.

This case constitutes one of the most fully documented patterns of procedural misconduct in Colorado domestic and civil courts. Because the trial courts have procedurally sealed the record and instituted unconstitutional gag orders to prevent the introduction of unredacted billing ledgers and XMP metadata, this platform ensures the evidence of fraud upon the court is not permanently suppressed.

The Open Challenge to Opposing Counsel

Retained civil defense counsel has attempted to weaponize this transparency effort, complaining to state regulatory boards that this public repository constitutes "harassment".

Our response remains unchanged from the official regulatory record:

"I stand by what I have posted and have invited any attorney to identify specific inaccuracies.".

Every assertion on this site is backed by native server logs, official court transcripts, and the attorneys' own unredacted billing ledgers. If the attorneys featured on this site Carol Glassman, Jay Freedberg, Adam Wiens, Ryan Dunn, John Palmeri, or William Dewey wish to dispute the facts, they are invited to do so on the public record rather than hiding behind procedural dismissals. You may disagree with the facts, but you will not be allowed to avoid them.

A Note for the Future

Beyond the metadata and the malpractice claims, this archive serves a deeply personal purpose.

"To protect myself I have launched 'TheGlassbergEffect.com'. It is my journal and one day a place where all can learn that being different does not mean being guilty. That you can survive the prolonged effects of emotional abuse and thrive, a place to hold those we intrust the laws of our land to uphold do not have free rein and I hope a place for change. It is for my children that one day I hope will see that I did not fight against any one person, that I have given their mother every opportunity to do what was right..."

This is the permanent record.

A forest with many trees and green grass

Be Curious.

The One Question No Attorney in This Case Can Answer Honestly

If you are an attorney, a judge, or a regulator, ask yourself this:

"If Jay Freedberg was 'Just a regular... Witness' according to the trial transcript, and his 'stipulated expert' status was a 'typographical mistake' according to your letter to DORA, then upon what legal authority was he permitted to provide expert opinion testimony—without a report—that resulted in a $197,200 income finding specifically formatted to hit a mortgage target?"

The Answer: There is no legal authority. If they say he was an expert, they admit they lied to the Judge about him being a "regular witness" to bypass the report deadline. If they say he was a regular witness, they admit the $197,200 expert finding is legally inadmissible and the immunity they claimed in civil court was a fraud.